Important Legal Reasoning Questions for CLAT 2026

The Important Legal Reasoning Questions for CLAT 2026 include passages and questions from different areas of law, such as contract law, criminal law, and tort law, along with some important principles, including the Doctrine of Precedent and the Principles of Natural Justice. The CLAT legal reasoning section will include 23 - 32 questions in total with a 25% weightage.

The purpose of the CLAT Legal Reasoning questions is to assess your general legal understanding as well as problem-solving skills. You will be given a series of facts and passages that highlight the legal theory that has to be implemented. You must carefully read the passages, extract the legal information they contain, and respond to questions asked based on the passage. There will be 4-6 passages in the CLAT 2026 Legal Reasoning section.

However, to get good scores in this section, you need to prepare well. Some Important Legal Reasoning Questions for CLAT 2026 will help you in preparing yourself while giving a sense of the format and idea of solving questions.

Legal Reasoning Questions for CLAT 2026

Here are some passages mentioned below for your CLAT preparation . Read them carefully and answer the CLAT legal reasoning questions based on them.

Passage 1

A few weeks ago, a renowned writer released a book that discusses sexuality and violence. While certain social groups have praised the book as an open and brave discussion of human nature, others have criticized it as disgusting and detrimental. Whether the book should be deemed immoral is up to the courts to decide. The "Community Standards Test" and the "Hicklin Test" are the primary criteria used by the courts to determine immorality.

Question 1: Which aspect of a publication is reviewed to decide its immorality under the "Hicklin Test"?

A: Sections of isolated publications are extracted from their context.

B: The reactions of the readers to the publishing.

C: The general concept and message of the publication.

D: The motivation of the author for creating the publication.

Question 2: Which basic right could be violated by the writers if the court finds the book to be immoral?

A: Right against exploitation.

B: Right to freedom of religion.

C: The right to free expression and speech.

D: Right to equality.

Question 3: Which of the following won't be taken into consideration if the court subjects the book to the "Community Standards Test"?

A: The context of the entire novel.

B: The existing social norms of acceptable behavior.

C: The socio-moral attitude of the community nowadays.

D: The perceived impact of the writings on the vulnerable readers.

Question 4: Even if the majority of the population does not find the book offensive, a small minority feels it has a negative impact on them. How would the Community Standards Test be applied in this case?

A: Both points of view would be given equal weight.

B: The perspective of the majority will be taken into consideration.

C: Those who have been negatively impacted will have their opinions taken into account.

D: Neither point of view would be taken into account.

Question 5: How will the depiction of violence be handled under the Hicklin Test if it is a vital component of the overall plot and message of the story?

A: It will be deemed offensive regardless of how it relates to the plot.

B: It wouldn't be deemed offensive because it is important to the plot.

C: It will be assessed according to how it could affect sensitive readers.

D: The novel as a whole will be assessed by it.

Passage 2

The Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), Section 319, allows a judge to summon more accused people during a trial if their involvement seems obvious. The Supreme Court of India reviewed the scope of this provision in a landmark judgment. The Court highlighted the need to apply this provision carefully and selectively to protect the right to a fair trial of the accused. The decision highlighted the need for a prima facie case prior to using Section 319 and warned against its abuse to avoid needless harassment of those who were not initially listed on the charge sheet.

Question 1: What is the main objective of CrPC Section 319?

A: To provide judges with the authority to change the accusations made against the accused.

B: Give judges the authority to interview more witnesses during a trial.

C: To enable courts to present more accused individuals during a trial.

D: To offer a way to challenge a trial court's ruling.

Question 2: Which protection against the use of Section 319 CrPC did the Supreme Court point out?

A: It needs to be implemented to stop the unwanted harassment of people.

B: It should be implemented to go around the standard investigative procedure.

C: It should be applied to include every potential accused in a single trial.

D: It should be applied to speed up trials.

Question 3: What opinion did the Supreme Court express on the abuse of Section 319 CrPC?

A: It should be applied to speed up the legal procedure.

B: It should be used to get around rulings from lesser courts.

C: It must be used liberally to make sure all parties have been investigated.

D: It should be used carefully to reduce unwanted problems.

Question 4: What is meant by "prima facie case" in the context of Section 319 CrPC?

A: A case in which the evidence first points to the participation of other accused parties.

B: A case in which new accusers are summoned without the need for proof.

C: A case in which the accuser's guilt is unquestionably proven by the proof presented.

D: A case in which the accused party willingly confesses to the crime.

Question 5: As per the judgement of the Supreme Court, how should Section 319 CrPC to be implemented?

A: Only in situations in which the accused appears in person.

B: Judiciously, sparingly, and with an effective argument.

C: Instantly, without requiring more proof.

D: Only when the accused are in court.

Passage 3

A writ is a remedy under public law. It is used to describe a formal, written order from a judicial authority instructing a person or authority to do something or not do it. Although the High Court exercises its judicial review authority, it does not serve as an appeals court. An order issued by the State or a Statutory Authority could be unlawful, illogical, or improperly procedural. A High Court can issue writs, orders, or instructions to enforce fundamental rights and for other purposes.

The High Court has equitable and discretionary writ jurisdiction. A court can issue a writ of mandamus, which directs a public authority to carry out an official duty. It can be issued only when the authority is subject to a legal duty and the petitioner has the authority to demand the fulfillment duty. The purpose of the Writ of Mandamus is to force the fulfillment of statutory, administrative, or ministerial public duties.

A person who establishes a legal right in themselves could be granted a writ of mandamus. It might be applied to someone who has a legal duty to comply but has ignored or failed to do so. Such a legal duty arises naturally. The remedial aspect of the writ of mandamus is where it is most powerful. Mandamus must be issued to avoid chaos from arising from a failure of justice in all situations where the law has not created a particular remedy.

Question 1: A concerned person filed a writ petition to force the government to enact legislation to mitigate the negative effects of the changing climate. Which of these statements describes the current situation?

A: A writ of mandamus will not be granted because the government is not legally required to enact legislation to mitigate the negative effects of the changing climate.

B: A writ of mandamus will not be granted, as no basic rights have been violated.

C: Writs of mandamus are an equitable remedy. Hence, it can be given.

D: Writ of mandamus is a discretionary remedy. It could be given.

Question 2: A rule was created by the state government to give its employees a discretionary dearness allowance. One of the workers petitioned the government for a mandamus, which would force it to give the dearness allowance. Which of these statements is accurate in this case?

A: As a remedy under public law, a writ of mandamus could be granted.

B: Writ of mandamus cannot be granted since the employee was given the right to receive dearness allowance under the statute.

C: Writ of mandamus cannot be given as no legal duty was placed on the government to provide dearness allowance.

D: Writ of mandamus is a discretionary remedy. It can be granted.

Question 3: In accordance with the law, a licensing officer must provide a license to a candidate who meets the requirements to get one. The licensing officer denied Mr. X's application for a license even though he met all the requirements for the type of license. Of the following statements, which is true in this case?

A: A writ of mandamus can be issued as the licensing officer has the final say over license approval.

B: One can apply for a writ of mandamus, which would compel the license officer to grant the license.

C: Since there has been no fundamental right violation, a writ of mandamus cannot be imposed ordering the license officer to grant the license.

D: A writ of mandamus cannot be given requiring the license officer to issue the license, as there is no violation of public duty.

Question 4: There is a contract for the sale of items between Mr. A and Mr. B. Mr. B filed a writ petition to ask for a mandamus to force Mr. A to fulfill his contractual duties after Mr. A violated them. Which of these statements represents the current situation?

A: A writ of mandamus is not possible since no basic rights have been violated.

B: A writ of mandamus could be granted because Mr. A is not legally required to carry out his end of the agreement.

C: As no fundamental rights have been violated, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued.

D: A writ of mandamus will not be given since Mr. B's contractual right is a private one.

Question 5: Which statement from the list below is false?

A: A writ of mandamus can be granted to enforce the execution of private duties that could be statutory, administrative, or ministerial.

B: The purpose of a writ of mandamus is purportedly to stop chaos from arising from an injustice.

C: If someone proves that a legal right exists, they may be granted a writ of mandamus.

D: It is possible to issue a writ of mandamus against an individual or authority who has a legal duty to comply but has forgotten to do so.

Also Read: Important Logical Reasoning Questions for CLAT 2026

Important Topics for CLAT 2026 Legal Reasoning

It is necessary to have an adequate understanding of the important topics for CLAT 2026 Legal Reasoning before beginning your preparation. This will enable you to prepare efficiently from the perspective of the actual exam.

• Criminal law
• Tort law
• International law
• Contract law
• Legal maxims
• Intellectual Property Law
• Public policy
• Moral philosophical enquiries
• Legal terms and meanings
• Monism and dualism
• Special Marriage Act
• General Legal Principles
• Legal Knowledge and Current Affairs
• International Treaties
• Conventions Affecting the National Legal Framework

Preparation Tips for CLAT 2026 Legal Reasoning

In CLAT 2026, the Legal Reasoning section is the decisive factor in a tie-breaker and accounts for 25% of the total score. This is why it is important to prepare well to score the best in this section. Here are some preparation tips for CLAT 2026 legal reasoning section:

• Focus on understanding important concepts and terminology to answer the passage-based questions.
• Understand the basic laws and regulations. It is necessary to regularly study legal writings such as legislation and important court decisions.
• Focus on breaking down situations, finding relevant data, and rationally applying legal concepts.
• Practice questions that challenge you to use legal concepts in different real situations. This will help you in developing your ability to assess and analyse the situation.
• Read editorials, legal articles, and newspapers on a regular basis to increase your reading comprehension and speed.
• Make your analytical and critical thinking skills stronger. Practice identifying the arguments' primary premises, basic assumptions, and conclusions. Look for any logical errors or gaps in the arguments.
• Practice simplifying passages and understanding the important aspects to efficiently handle lengthy and detailed legal texts.
• Attempt previous years' CLAT legal reasoning questions and practice exams on a regular basis. They will enhance your time management and accuracy while providing insight into the different types of questions asked.
• It is important to recite concepts and principles repeatedly. Hence, spend some time revising, ideally once a week.

With these Important Legal Reasoning Questions for CLAT 2026, and preparation tips, you can start your journey for CLAT 2026. Practice as many questions as you can and improve your chances of qualifying CLAT 2026.

Are you feeling lost and unsure about what career path to take after completing 12th standard?

Say goodbye to confusion and hello to a bright future!

Take The Free Test Now

Was this article helpful?

0 Upvotes

0 Downvotes